T 415.392.7900
F 415.398.4321
505 Sansome Street
Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94111
17. Toward Utility Rate Normalization,
44 Cal. 3d 870 (1988), 750 P.2d 787.
The Court affirmed a Commission decision which authorized interim rate increases for PG&E pursuant to its major additions adjustment clause (“MAAC”). The Commission authorized the rate increase prior to reaching a final determination on the prudence of PG&E’s investment in the plant. TURN asserted that the Commission could award interim rate relief only where (1) such relief was required to forestall a financial emergency or (2) the cost basis for the relief was beyond dispute. The Court, without really fixing the parameters of the Commission’s authority to provide interim relief, found that the Commission had the discretion to order it here as a means of insuring that present and future ratepayers fairly shared in recovering PG&E’s costs. Future disputes related to interim relief may turn on what is “required by law” (See Para. 3 supra) before any order is issued.
Abridged Summary
Links Re: Selected Cases:
- Util. Consumers’ Action Net.
- The Util. Reform Net.
- S. California Edison
- Pacific Bell Wireless
- S. California Edison
- Santa Clara v.. Trans. Au.
- S. California Edison (CEERT)
- Util. Consumers’ Action Net.
- City of St. Helena
- PG&E Corp.
- S. California Edison
- North Shuttle
- Assembly of CA
- Camp Meeker Water Syst.
- Napa Valley Wine Train
- S. California Gas Company
- Toward Utili. Rate Norm.
- City & County of SF
- S. California Gas Co.,Pac. Tel. & Tele. Co. & PG&E
- Gen. Tel. Co. of CA
- K. Cory, State Controller
- U.S. Steel Corporation
- County of Inyo
- “CLAM,” Towards Util.Rate Normalization

